WASHINGTON — A broad coalition of disability rights organizations is welcoming the introduction of a new bipartisan resolution in the United States House of Representatives that explicitly affirms the civil right of individuals with disabilities to live, thrive, and receive necessary support services within their own homes and local communities rather than being segregated in institutional settings.
The measure, designated as House Resolution 1586, was formally introduced this week by a bipartisan group of lawmakers. Leading the legislative effort are Bipartisan Disability Caucus Co-Chairs Representative Debbie Dingell, a Democrat from Michigan, and Representative Brian Fitzpatrick, a Republican from Pennsylvania. The initiative has also drawn early and significant bipartisan backing from fellow House members, including Representatives Kean, Lawler, Wilson, Scanlon, and Simon.
The Defend Community Integration Coalition (DCIC)—a powerful alliance of leading national disability organizations—has issued a strong public statement applauding the introduction of H. Res. 1586. The coalition emphasizes that the resolution serves as a vital reminder of the foundational legal and moral principles governing disability rights in the United States, pointing directly to the historical legislative record and landmark judicial precedents that establish community integration as a core protection under federal law.
At the heart of the resolution is a reaffirmation of the historic Olmstead v. Lois Curtis Supreme Court ruling, which was handed down more than 27 years ago. In that landmark decision, the nation’s highest court held that the unjustified institutional isolation and segregation of people with disabilities constitutes illegal discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The ruling established that individuals with qualifying disabilities have a right to receive state-funded services in community settings rather than institutions, provided that the affected individuals are not opposed to such placement, that community placement can be reasonably accommodated, and that the placement can be handled appropriately given the state’s resources.
However, advocates and the authors of H. Res. 1586 note that the legal foundation for community integration extends even further back than the Olmstead ruling, reflecting a decades-long bipartisan commitment to civil rights and inclusion. The resolution meticulously lays out the historical record, pointing out that federal regulations enacted in 1977 and 1978 under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act explicitly established that services and programs for people with disabilities must be delivered in the most integrated setting appropriate to their individual needs. Congress subsequently ratified those critical federal rules when it formally amended Section 504 in 1978.
Years later, when Congress debated and passed the landmark Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, lawmakers codified these protections directly into statutory law. Within the text of the ADA, Congress made a formal finding that the unnecessary isolation and segregation of individuals with disabilities represent a serious and pervasive form of discrimination. Consequently, lawmakers incorporated the integration regulations originally developed under Section 504 directly into the public services title of the ADA.

When the Supreme Court delivered its ruling in Olmstead, it was essentially affirming a legal integration mandate that had already been written and enacted by Congress years prior. Disability advocates underscore that this integration mandate is not a shifting policy preference or a judicial suggestion, but rather an enforceable civil right that has been repeatedly reaffirmed by federal courts for decades.
According to the Defend Community Integration Coalition, this renewed legislative clarity is urgently needed in the current political and legal landscape. The integration mandate is currently facing new, unprecedented challenges and attacks from various fronts, making the formal affirmation of congressional intent by lawmakers remarkably timely. Disabled individuals belong in their communities, and supporters argue that H. Res. 1586 sends an unmistakable, bipartisan signal that Congress firmly stands behind the statutory promises it made decades ago.
In response to the introduction of the resolution, the DCIC is mounting a coordinated advocacy push. The coalition is urging every member of the House of Representatives to sign on as a cosponsor of H. Res. 1586, demonstrating a unified front in defense of disability rights. Furthermore, advocates are calling upon leaders in the United States Senate to introduce a companion bipartisan resolution as swiftly as possible to establish parallel support in the upper chamber.
Beyond legislative declarations of intent, the coalition emphasizes that federal and state policymakers must back up their statutory commitments with concrete financial investments. Specifically, advocates are calling for increased funding and resources dedicated to home and community-based services (HCBS), alongside targeted investments to support the direct care workforce. Because personal care assistants, direct support professionals, and home health aides form the backbone of independent community living, advocates argue that bolstering this workforce is essential to making the promise of the Olmstead decision a daily reality for millions of Americans.
The Defend Community Integration Coalition brings together a broad and influential cross-section of the nation’s most prominent disability advocacy and legal organizations. The founding members of the coalition include the National Council on Independent Living, the American Association of People with Disabilities, the Autistic Self Advocacy Network, Caring Across Generations, the National Disability Rights Network, United Spinal Association, Access Living, the National Association of Councils on Developmental Disabilities, the Center for Public Representation, the Bazelon Center for Mental Health Law, and the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund.
As H. Res. 1586 moves through the legislative process, the coalition and its supporters intend to keep community integration at the forefront of the national conversation, urging lawmakers across the political spectrum to defend the civil rights of disabled Americans and protect their freedom to live fully integrated lives within their communities.
